The Rev. William Sanchez of Albuquerque, N.M., has more than just the standard priest’s cross hanging from his neck. After a genetic test showed that some of his ancestors from Spain were Jewish, he took to wearing a Star of David, as well.
Such is the “mystique of Judaism,” writes Jon Entine, author of the new book “Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People,” that the “romance of a few genetic markers” can change a person’s entire outlook on life.
Entine, a columnist for Ethical Corporation magazine and an adjunct fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, is best known for the controversial 1999 book “Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We Are Afraid To Talk About It,” a politically incorrect look at African Americans and sports. With his latest volume, he continues to raise ticklish questions about the role of genes in defining identity.
“I’ve always had an interest in genetics and the controversial issues of race,” he said in an interview with the Forward. After Entine wrote “Taboo,” he learned that his family’s history of breast cancer came from the BRCA 2 mutation. It was then that he became interested in Jewish genetics.
The book chronicles his attempt to use DNA to answer the age-old question, “Who is a Jew?” Judaism is unique among world religions, he said, because of its ancestral dimension, and since less than half of 1% of Jews had children with non-Jews until the 20th century, Jews are a “gold mine for genetics.”
This gold mine has had a heavy impact on the lives of some, who, like Sanchez, have learned later in life that they have some Jewish ancestry. In doing research for the book, Entine encountered a range of reactions from those who merely find the results mildly interesting to those who, after learning their genetic heritage, change their whole life, and end up “taking their Jewish ancestry very seriously.”
Beyond such psychological questions, the book also tackles issues of historical significance, from the possibility of using DNA to find out if biblical personages actually existed to finding out where mass conversions to and from Judaism might have occurred.
Entine also explores the medical and biological effects of endogamy — or “marrying in” — over time. Recessive genes that otherwise might have filtered out of a population have remained present in Jews, leading to such “Jewish” genetic diseases as Tay-Sachs, Gaucher disease and the type of breast cancer of which Entine himself is a carrier.
Building upon a controversial study published two years ago, Entine holds that there may be a link between the “Jewish” genetic diseases and “superior” Jewish intelligence.
Despite the contentious notion that one population might be more intelligent or, in the case of Entine’s previous book, more athletic, Entine says that “genetics prescribe reality” and that ignoring how our “potential is determined by our genes” does not change the fact that genetics, along with environment, can be very important to who someone is. “You can’t turn clay into marble,” he said.
Entine sees the whole matter of nature vs. nurture as an “artificial dichotomy.” He said that an entirely new way of thinking is needed to deal with what genetics are telling us. As with “Taboo,” Entine expects criticism from “ideological egalitarians” but believes that while the Human Genome Project has shown us how similar humans are to each other, “we need a discourse on human differences, as well.”
“Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People” is due out on October 24.
"the idea of a genetically determined common culture is just too unlikely for me to believe."--- So is the parting of the Sea of Reeds, the direct hearing of the voice of G-d by a million Israelites, the manna from heaven, the lasting of clothes and shoes for 40 years in the desert, and many other "miraculous" events. The Reverend Francis Bayes dealt with this issue. If the most likely explanation of a series of highly improbable events would be divine intervention, and the highly improbable events actually occur, the likelihood that the explanation is divine intervention is increased. And further improbable events of the same kind strengthen the likelihood that the true cause is divine intervention. "How odd Of God To Choose The Jews"
Tay-Sachs and Gaucher are each caused by a single mutation in a single gene. You have either 2, 1 or 0 copies of the mutated allele. Intelligence and personality involve dozens of neurotransmitters and receptors that are affected by dozens of other proteins. Even if we round down alot get a conservative estimate and we assume zero intermarrage, we wouldn't get a "Jewish intelligence" or "Jewish personality type". Round down and say only 10 loci determine intelligence and personality. A person can be homozygous recessive, heterozygous or homozygous dominant, 3 possible states per locus. That means there would be 3 to the 10th power combinations of those states. That leads to 59,049 genetic predispositions. There may be a few genetically determined cultural traits, like a common food allergy leading to a food taboo, however the idea of a genetically determined common culture is just too unlikely for me to believe.
"the idea of a genetically determined common culture is just too unlikely for me to believe."--- So is the parting of the Sea of Reeds, the direct hearing of the voice of G-d by a million Israelites, the manna from heaven, the lasting of clothes and shoes for 40 years in the desert, and many other "miraculous" events. The Reverend Francis Bayes dealt with this issue. If the most likely explanation of a series of highly improbable events would be divine intervention, and the highly improbable events actually occur, the likelihood that the explanation is divine intervention is increased. And further improbable events of the same kind strengthen the likelihood that the true cause is divine intervention. "How odd Of God To Choose The Jews"
There is a more likely explaination for cultural similarities within a group. Educational and cultural institutions can pass on the same cultural traits to everyone in the group.
If, as Entine claims, "genetics determines reality," then no one who does not have Jewish genetic markers can count as "really" Jewish. I myself, along with millions of other converts to Judaism, going all the way back to Ruth, would be disheartened by this, to say the least. Beware of using genetic science to promote, even by implication, a racially exclusivist conception of "who is a Jew."
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.