President Bush, contrary to popular impression, is not opposed to the use of all stem cells in the treatment of patients. He is opposed to the use of embryonic stem cells. These are stem cells to be found in an embryo.
This opposition is based on a belief that human life begins at conception. The embryo, according to this belief, is a person; obviously it is not a full-grown person, but a human being nevertheless. Therefore, according to this belief, to use stem cells from an embryo is or should be illegal.
The crime is not a piece of trivia. If life begins at conception, the doctor who performs an abortion is a murderer.
Is the belief that life begins at conception founded in scientific evidence? The answer to that question is not easy to come by. There are doctors who perform abortions but refuse to do so after a given point of development. Obviously, the date varies depending on the doctor and, perhaps, on the condition of the woman. Those who hold that life begins with conception are generally resting on religious tenets rather than on scientific evidence.
For many years, some states outlawed abortions. In the landmark case of Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court found these laws to be unconstitutional. In the light of all of the above, there is no reason that the use of embryonic stem cells should be illegal.
Individuals who do not wish to be treated with embryonic stem cells should have the unabridged right to refuse such treatment. But to outlaw the use of embryonic stem cells is to tear down the wall of separation between church and state.
This June 27, 2007 column was the latest posting of Gus Tyler's articles for the Forward. Is he still contributing? Thanks.
If the anti-abortion stance is so critical to so-called social conservatives, how do they deal with the fact that the Bible doesn't even broach the subject?
Is there a scriptural basis for believing that an embryo is the beginning of life, and therefore sacred?
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.