Remembering ‘Hair’ and The Tangle of the 1960s
Although no one celebrates it, a historic date in the American calendar was marked two weeks ago. On April 29, 1968, the musical that encapsulated the mood and spirit of the 1960s opened on Broadway. “Hair” both shocked and titillated its audiences with its in-your-face rejection of the values of the older generation, encouraging young people to experiment with hashish and LSD, and calling for the liberation of all societal constraints, epitomized by the now-famous scene in which the entire cast ripped off their clothes.
Mention the ’60s today, and you hear little more than a chuckle and a remark about bellbottoms and tie-dyed shirts. But in fact, during those years, both sides — the young rebels as well as the older defenders of the establishment — took the struggle very seriously. And in the middle of it all, I, a sheltered 12-year-old girl from a traditional Jewish home, looked on, not knowing which side I was on.
My first awareness of any “revolution” hit me in the spring of 1969 as a sixth grader, when our teacher made the startling announcement that girls would now be permitted to wear pants to school. The news elicited loud cheers from my girlfriends, but a feeling of dread in me. Rules had always given me a level of comfort, because they made my world more predictable and secure. Hearing that an established tradition — of boys wearing pants to school and girls wearing skirts — could be cast off so easily, I wondered what other radical changes awaited us. My answer came a month later, when my parents shipped me off to summer camp.
This was my third summer at Camp Hemshekh, a Jewish summer camp in Mountaindale, N.Y., founded in 1957 by Holocaust survivors and members of the Jewish Labor Bund. I felt very much at home in Hemshekh because in those years, most of the campers and counselors hailed from Yiddish-speaking homes like I did. During the summer, we learned dozens of Yiddish songs, the plays we performed were in Yiddish and every year we commemorated Ghetto Day in memory of the Jewish fighters and victims of the Holocaust.
But that summer of 1969 — the year of Woodstock — everything was different. Compared with previous years, where every bunk followed a daily schedule, the mood now was much freer; no one forced us campers to do anything. Part of the reason was the change in camp directors (European-born Michael Baran had been replaced by a young American, Gabe Ross), but no doubt it was also a result of the fact that the day before the campers arrived, a group of counselors had already been fired for smoking pot, leaving the camp with a significantly smaller staff.
The once haimish Jewish environment I had come to expect at Hemshekh quickly transformed into a purely American expression of hippie culture. Truth be told, I had mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, it was all so strange and unnerving; on the other, it was my first window into a world from which my parents had so carefully protected me. My counselors strung Native American beads over every entranceway in the bunk and lit incense every morning, filling the bunk with its sweet exotic fragrance. The “Hair” album was played from morning till night. As soon as the final song ended, someone turned over the record and started from the beginning. After three weeks, I knew all the lyrics by heart.
Although most of my 12-year-old bunkmates were, like me, daughters of Holocaust survivors, you couldn’t tell. Like many Americans of our generation, they wore tight, ripped jeans; smoked cigarettes (and, no doubt, pot, too), and did things that I naively thought only adults did. One day, I walked into the bunk as several of the girls were playing spin the bottle with some older boys. When I played this with my friends at home, just planting a peck on someone’s cheek made us blush. But here, when the Pepsi bottle pointed to someone of the opposite sex, the two kids began kissing passionately, like a scene right out of a Hollywood movie. Embarrassed, and once again feeling like the odd man out, I quietly slipped out the door.
The ubiquitous motto of the ’60s — Don’t trust anyone over 30 — penetrated the conversations of the counselors and, inevitably, the campers. When the older Bundists (most of them parents of counselors) came up to camp and gave a speech, the younger generation would denigrate and mock them with such anger, it seemed to border on hatred. I confess that I occasionally joined in and laughed along with them.
But the worst thing that summer was a movie played for the entire camp on a rainy day, called “Wild in the Streets.” It told the story of an underground rebel who works his way into the political establishment, leads the fight to lower the voting age to 15 and gets elected president. Once in office, he turns against his older supporters by releasing an edict that everyone over 35 be forced to retire, sent to re-education camps and coerced into taking LSD. I still remember one scene where the “retirees” stood, frightened, behind barbed wire, like prisoners in a concentration camp. The film was obviously meant to be satirical, but, at the time, it scared the daylights out of me. I really thought the sky was falling.
Okay, so I was wrong…. The following summer, Baran returned as camp director, and the revolutionary spirit had begun to dissipate. Once again, the camp was alive with Yiddish music. Many of the so-called rebels later became parents, teachers, doctors and other assorted professionals. In other words, they joined the establishment they had once so despised. But from time to time, when I think of the summer of ’69, of “Hair,” Woodstock, of the generations at war with each other, of a world that seemed to have gone haywire — I thank God that my own kids know nothing about revolution, and that they view the ’60s as simply an odd chapter in the history books.
This article is adapted from a version that appeared in the Forverts.
Comments
I love the way you blended eastern European tradition with the sixties' lemming-like embrace of revolution. Lovely essay.
As an unreconstructed ex-heepy, I appreciate the bewilderment expressed by the writer. The rest of us are also bewildered. After our great attempt at liberating ourselves from the bastards who were running the murderous status quo (not unlike at present,) most participants later crawled on their bellies back to the purveyors of the old lies and propaganda. What a relief it must have been for the lumpen-youth to no longer be bombarded with new ideas, but cringe meekly back to the institutional all-knowers and their "traditional wisdom." So, the camp was alive with "Yiddish music," huh? No more Jefferson Airplane, Country Joe, or Grateful Dead?
As for the "generations at war" with one another, it still goes on only the nice lady, snug as a bug in her middle-class cocoon, is unaware of it. It's not goodwiwes like the writer and "other assorted professionals" who are harassed by the police. The war is reflected in the more than 2 million prisoners in America, the most of any country on the planet, and in the depredations of the innumerable police groups as they assault and kill our own people in the name of the war on drugs. Please make sure your kids never hear about any of that. Just twirl your dreidel, clap your hands, and be happy for the tiny liberation you grasped - being allowed to wear pants to school.
rukhl was a camper in my bunk. i remember that she was quite different than how she describes herself. she was involved with drugs and going to "third base with boys". she is rewritting her history to suit the times.

Print this article
Email this article
Other articles by Rukhl Schaechter
More in Arts & Culture
I'm sorry that Rokhl's kids "know nothing about revolution." It leaves a significant gap in their knowledge of history and, thus, leaves them vulnerable to the same excesses she describes.